George Bush says Osama Bin Laden is evil. OBL says George W. is evil.
If you take the emotion out of it and were to run it like a court case, who would win?
Over 3000 were killed in the 9/11 attacks. Over 2000 have been killed due to the "faulty" intelligence for the Iraq war and we are still counting. OBL wants Muslims (for sake of arguments, let's call them his "mandate") to be good Muslims and do their duty and follow him blindly on the path to victory. GW would like Americans to "trust" him on the war on terror (another word for following him blindly). You can argue, both are equally religiously fanatic in their own right. The point being, on paper, how do they differ? Can't think of one way in which they are actually different. In this case who will win?
I don't really know. All I know is that GW knows what I talk with my parents in India
No comments:
Post a Comment